JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 1, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓
Topic · hard data
Suplica Contra El Auto 087 De 2009, La Corte Decide Rechazar La Solicitud Debido A Que El Recurso De Suplica Solo Procede Contra El Auto Que Rechaza La Admisión De Una Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Rechazar recurso de súplica por falta de competencia contra auto que decidió solicitud de aclaración sentencia SU1010/08
Recurso De Suplica
  • Procede únicamente respecto del auto que rechaza la admisión de la demanda de inconstitucionalidad
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Rechazar el recurso de suplica presentado por la ciudadana Luz Mary Gonzalez contra el Auto 087 del 18 de febrero de 2009, proferido por el Magistrado Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo por medio del cual se decidio la solicitud de aclaracion de las Sentencia SU-1010 de 2008, presentada por la misma ciudadana.
  2. Segundo. Contra el presente auto no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.